Don't mess this up!
-Kevin Deenihan, Emeritus Home Archive Extended Help CalStuff! Disclaimer: Calstuff and/or the opinions expressed are not affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley. Recent Guest Posts
Tenants' Rights Weekby Jason Overman Search Powered by: Contact
FaceBook CalStuff! Allen L. About IM Andy R. About IM Ben N. About IM Cooper N. About IM Syndication
Site Feed (ATOM)
Comments Feed Add to LJ Friends Berkeley Blogs
CalJunket With humor. Cal Patriot Blog Conservative Blog UC Berkeley Livejournal Discussion Forum California Patriot Watch Self Explanatory Brad DeLong Econ Prof The Bird House Cal Prof on everything Cal Politik Rants & Raves Beetle Beat Full Time Whiner "Frat" Life Cal "Frat" Boy Cal Tzedek Jewish Students Blog Personal as Public
Soft Boiled Life Hilariously Un-PC. Cal Alumni/ Squelch Blogs
Kedstuff Remember him? I Fought the Law Optimus Primed Zembla With Cuteness Ne Quid Nimis With Photography |
Thursday, May 16, 2002
Beetle says all the right things about the Daily Cal.
The Daily Cal gives papers to students at no cost to them. 5 days a week, students get a healthy dosing of typically solid news, opinion, and the god-blessed crossword. All the rhetoric about 'duty to students' and 'commitment to blah blah' creates a contract that never existed. A contract implies some form of reciprocal agreement, which doesn't exist here. I can think of no possible theory where a party can demand changes in something being given freely to them. And this is the bare minimum of legal theory. There are other, more elaborate, reasons for the Daily Cal not being beholden to anyone else. Journalistic integrity, for example. Even Corporate paymasters, in theory, are supposed to be separated from the practice of journalism. The possible exception to this 'Donatives don't equal Control' thing is if the ASUC is indirectly subsidizing the Daily Cal by keeping their rent purposefully low. I haven't seen conclusive evidence this is true. If it is, I would argue that journalistic integrity demands that Government stay clear of their efforts. I would argue that this indirect subsidy benefits students far more than adding another floor of (rent free) student group offices would. The Economic argument there is that the Daily Cal produces a product that is free to students, giving them a large surplus. The Daily Cal makes up for much of that surplus from advertisers. Since the DC is barely breaking even, if that, then students are paying for the DC in terms of 1. how much rent could be collected from throwing the Daily Cal out for somebody paying at market value OR 2. what student groups could be housed there instead. Since no one has seriously considered renting the floor out to someone else, the only economic cost to students is foregone room for student groups. Note that students are already benefitting, since they aren't paying the full cost of the product they receive. And that too isn't the true cost, since space allocation in Eshleman is already inefficient. Some of the purported demand for office space could be relieved by, say, using the seventh floor efficently, etc. So by kicking out the Daily Cal we take Current Campus Situation MINUS Daily Cal's Rent to the ASUC MINUS Daily Cal's ability to produce at current level PLUS Benefit to campus from student groups housed in Eshleman MINUS Cost of (unremedied) inefficient use of Eshleman. EQUALS New Situation I kind've doubt the campus as a whole will win from this deal. Email This Post! |
Advertisements
Cal Magazines
Heuristic Squelch Humor Mag California Patriot Conservative Hardboiled Lefty/Asian mag. Bezerk Comics Mag In Passing Bloggish Cal Newsites
Daily CalifornianStudent Newspaper Daily Planet City Newspaper Berkeleyan Faculty/Staff news Newscenter Administrative Announcements Indybay Hard Left News East Bay Express Alt-weekly Cal Other
UC Rally Committee Stand nineteen feet tall! Be united! Be tough! Be proud! CyberBears GO BEARS! ASUC Cal's Student government One Cal's Student Portal Berkeley Bookswap Good Deals |