Calstuff
Don't mess this up!
-Kevin Deenihan,
Emeritus


Home
Archive
Extended

Help CalStuff!

Disclaimer: Calstuff and/or the opinions expressed are not affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley.
Recent Guest Posts
Tenants' Rights Week
by Jason Overman
Search

Powered by:
Contact

FaceBook CalStuff!
Allen L.
 About
 
 IM
Andy R.
 About
 
 IM
Ben N.
 About
 
 IM
Cooper N.

 About
 
 IM
Syndication
Site Feed (ATOM)
Comments Feed
Add to LJ Friends

Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Subscribe with Bloglines
Berkeley Blogs
CalJunket
With humor.
Cal Patriot Blog
Conservative Blog
UC Berkeley Livejournal
Discussion Forum
California Patriot Watch
Self Explanatory
Brad DeLong
Econ Prof
The Bird House
Cal Prof on everything
Cal Politik
Rants & Raves
Beetle Beat
Full Time Whiner
"Frat" Life
Cal "Frat" Boy
Cal Tzedek
Jewish Students Blog
Personal as Public
Soft Boiled Life
Hilariously Un-PC.
Cal Alumni/ Squelch Blogs
Kedstuff
Remember him?
I Fought the Law
Optimus Primed
Zembla
With Cuteness
Ne Quid Nimis
With Photography
Friday, June 14, 2002
# posted by Kevin @ 12:56 PM

The Berkeley Summer Reading List, an annual waste of time for incoming Freshmen, has been announced. It was cute to watch the new students consciencly writing down the titles when they were announced when I went through CalSO two years ago, suffering from some ineffable feeling that they would be tested on this someday.

The theme this year is 'Banned and Challenged Books,' so of course the list is full of humdrum choices that are part of California's mandatory reading list.
Students are being invited to read a dozen "challenged" novels, books that someone sought to restrict or ban. The books were chosen by select UC Berkeley faculty and staff members off the American Library Association's list of the 100 most challenged books from 1990 to 2000.

"And usually when someone doesn't want you to read something, it means that there's something valuable in that book," advises the introduction to the list, distributed this week to fall freshmen.
So we're making decisions based on what a bunch of brainless Alabama rednecks don't want me to read? Isn't that kind of a reverse-reverse stupid? Why doesn't Berkeley go for a theme more highbrow and cultural then 'Morons and Racists don't like these.' ?

Here's the list:
1. "Lord of the Flies" by William Golding
New York: Penguin Books, 1954, (c)1982

2. "Song of Solomon" by Toni Morrison
New York: Dutton/Plume, 1987, (c)1977

3. "Catcher in the Rye" by J.D. Salinger
Boston: Little, Brown, 1991, (c)1951

4. "Beloved" by Toni Morrison
New York: Dutton/Plume, 1988

5. "Adventures of Huckleberry Finn" by Mark Twain
New York: Viking/Penguin, 1986

6. "The House of the Spirits" by Isabel Allende
New York: Bantam Books, 1986

7. "The Color Purple" by Alice Walker
New York: Pocket Books, 1990

8. "To Kill a Mockingbird" by Harper Lee
New York, NY : HarperCollins Publishers, 1999

9. "Brave New World" by Aldous Huxley
New York: Harper, 1998, (c)1932

10. "The Handmaid's Tale" by Margaret Atwood
New York: Bantam, 1998

11. "The Adventures of Tom Sawyer" by Mark Twain
New York: Bantam Books, 1986

12. "SlaughterHouse Five" by Kurt Vonnegut
New York: Dell, 1991, (c) 1969.
I dislike this.

For one thing, it's repetitive: Huck Finn and Tom Sawyer are thematically and in writing style very similiar books. Same goes (to a lesser extent) with picking two Morrison titles.

It's claim to be a compendium of 'forbidden' books must be based on some ancient, old use of the term. These are books that were under fire decades and decades ago, and get challenged these days mostly because of their ubiquity across the Nation; attacked not just because of their content but because of their entrenchment in national reading lists. A full 5 (!) of the 12 are in California's High School reading syllabus alone. Most of the others came highly recommended from all of my English Teachers.

This is not to say these aren't valuable books. Most of them are, although I'd rather spend a month with my ass corked up then read Color Purple. But to portray them as 'under attack' is to ignore the collective endorsement of a country-wide educational establishment, plus Oprah, plus Rosie O'Donnell. If Berkeley really wanted to go with books 'under attack,' they'd go with Drug-culture books, like Hunter Thompson, or perhaps with challenging Revolutionary books from the Third World like Arundhati Roy.

Zzzz.

Email This Post!

Home
Advertisements
Advertising Policy

Place an Ad on Calstuff



Get Firefox!

Cal Magazines
Heuristic Squelch
Humor Mag
California Patriot
Conservative
Hardboiled
Lefty/Asian mag.
Bezerk
Comics Mag
In Passing
Bloggish
Cal Newsites
Daily Californian
Student Newspaper
Daily Planet
City Newspaper
Berkeleyan
Faculty/Staff news
Newscenter
Administrative Announcements
Indybay
Hard Left News
East Bay Express
Alt-weekly
Cal Other
UC Rally Committee
Stand nineteen feet tall! Be united! Be tough! Be proud!
CyberBears
GO BEARS!
ASUC
Cal's Student government
One
Cal's Student Portal
Berkeley Bookswap
Good Deals

Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com