Don't mess this up!
-Kevin Deenihan, Emeritus Home Archive Extended Help CalStuff! Disclaimer: Calstuff and/or the opinions expressed are not affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley. Recent Guest Posts
Tenants' Rights Weekby Jason Overman Search Powered by: Contact
FaceBook CalStuff! Allen L. About IM Andy R. About IM Ben N. About IM Cooper N. About IM Syndication
Site Feed (ATOM)
Comments Feed Add to LJ Friends Berkeley Blogs
CalJunket With humor. Cal Patriot Blog Conservative Blog UC Berkeley Livejournal Discussion Forum California Patriot Watch Self Explanatory Brad DeLong Econ Prof The Bird House Cal Prof on everything Cal Politik Rants & Raves Beetle Beat Full Time Whiner "Frat" Life Cal "Frat" Boy Cal Tzedek Jewish Students Blog Personal as Public
Soft Boiled Life Hilariously Un-PC. Cal Alumni/ Squelch Blogs
Kedstuff Remember him? I Fought the Law Optimus Primed Zembla With Cuteness Ne Quid Nimis With Photography |
Friday, June 14, 2002
The Berkeley Summer Reading List, an annual waste of time for incoming Freshmen, has been announced. It was cute to watch the new students consciencly writing down the titles when they were announced when I went through CalSO two years ago, suffering from some ineffable feeling that they would be tested on this someday.
The theme this year is 'Banned and Challenged Books,' so of course the list is full of humdrum choices that are part of California's mandatory reading list. Students are being invited to read a dozen "challenged" novels, books that someone sought to restrict or ban. The books were chosen by select UC Berkeley faculty and staff members off the American Library Association's list of the 100 most challenged books from 1990 to 2000.So we're making decisions based on what a bunch of brainless Alabama rednecks don't want me to read? Isn't that kind of a reverse-reverse stupid? Why doesn't Berkeley go for a theme more highbrow and cultural then 'Morons and Racists don't like these.' ? Here's the list: 1. "Lord of the Flies" by William GoldingI dislike this. For one thing, it's repetitive: Huck Finn and Tom Sawyer are thematically and in writing style very similiar books. Same goes (to a lesser extent) with picking two Morrison titles. It's claim to be a compendium of 'forbidden' books must be based on some ancient, old use of the term. These are books that were under fire decades and decades ago, and get challenged these days mostly because of their ubiquity across the Nation; attacked not just because of their content but because of their entrenchment in national reading lists. A full 5 (!) of the 12 are in California's High School reading syllabus alone. Most of the others came highly recommended from all of my English Teachers. This is not to say these aren't valuable books. Most of them are, although I'd rather spend a month with my ass corked up then read Color Purple. But to portray them as 'under attack' is to ignore the collective endorsement of a country-wide educational establishment, plus Oprah, plus Rosie O'Donnell. If Berkeley really wanted to go with books 'under attack,' they'd go with Drug-culture books, like Hunter Thompson, or perhaps with challenging Revolutionary books from the Third World like Arundhati Roy. Zzzz. Email This Post! |
Advertisements
Cal Magazines
Heuristic Squelch Humor Mag California Patriot Conservative Hardboiled Lefty/Asian mag. Bezerk Comics Mag In Passing Bloggish Cal Newsites
Daily CalifornianStudent Newspaper Daily Planet City Newspaper Berkeleyan Faculty/Staff news Newscenter Administrative Announcements Indybay Hard Left News East Bay Express Alt-weekly Cal Other
UC Rally Committee Stand nineteen feet tall! Be united! Be tough! Be proud! CyberBears GO BEARS! ASUC Cal's Student government One Cal's Student Portal Berkeley Bookswap Good Deals |