Calstuff
Don't mess this up!
-Kevin Deenihan,
Emeritus


Home
Archive
Extended

Help CalStuff!

Disclaimer: Calstuff and/or the opinions expressed are not affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley.
Recent Guest Posts
Tenants' Rights Week
by Jason Overman
Search

Powered by:
Contact

FaceBook CalStuff!
Allen L.
 About
 
 IM
Andy R.
 About
 
 IM
Ben N.
 About
 
 IM
Cooper N.

 About
 
 IM
Syndication
Site Feed (ATOM)
Comments Feed
Add to LJ Friends

Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Subscribe with Bloglines
Berkeley Blogs
CalJunket
With humor.
Cal Patriot Blog
Conservative Blog
UC Berkeley Livejournal
Discussion Forum
California Patriot Watch
Self Explanatory
Brad DeLong
Econ Prof
The Bird House
Cal Prof on everything
Cal Politik
Rants & Raves
Beetle Beat
Full Time Whiner
"Frat" Life
Cal "Frat" Boy
Cal Tzedek
Jewish Students Blog
Personal as Public
Soft Boiled Life
Hilariously Un-PC.
Cal Alumni/ Squelch Blogs
Kedstuff
Remember him?
I Fought the Law
Optimus Primed
Zembla
With Cuteness
Ne Quid Nimis
With Photography
Friday, February 28, 2003
# posted by Kevin @ 10:59 AM

Correction to the Correction time. It's still kinda confusing!
Yesterday's correction on "Student Groups Face Stricter Conduct Code" was unclear and problematic. The correction should have said that under the Code of Student Conduct, only individual students can currently face student conduct hearings, whereas student groups as a whole cannot face a conduct hearing.
So in the future, assuming these code revisions are made, the University could charge all of SJP and hold a hearing for every one of them at the same time. This instead of holding individual hearings.

I'm not familiar with the Code of Student Conduct.. I know Calstuff Readers are, so perhaps they could comment on this. This would certainly be a huge change. It'd also be massively controversial, and I just can't see the Academic Senate approving it. Not to mention students; just about every group who would fall under this new regulation is political. Who's in favor of allowing the Administration to hold mass 60+ person hearings when they botched a case against a single one? What does it mean to 'try a group?' That each person would receive a punishment according to what the group did? IE, 'we find the Berkeley College Republicans guilty and expel all of them?'

More likely a system like this would work like the current Fraternity regulations. Breaking the Fraternity Laws can lead to community service hours, suspension of partying privileges, and revoking University recognition as an extreme. That's controversial as it is without bringing in freedom of political expression into it.

I don't think the Daily Cal is out of the woods on this one yet. The article quotes a single unnamed source. No quotes from Academic Senate reps. Nothing from Student Judicial Affairs, or University Officials. The article doesn't even make clear what Committee is hypothetically spearheading these changes. The seemingly-collobarating (sic) quote from Mr. Falcone appears to be a miscommunication; he doesn't sound that concerned in person. Ms. Ahn was acting on the same information the Daily Cal was.

Time for a followup before the Retraction to the Clarification to the Correction appears.
Email This Post!

Home
Advertisements
Advertising Policy

Place an Ad on Calstuff



Get Firefox!

Cal Magazines
Heuristic Squelch
Humor Mag
California Patriot
Conservative
Hardboiled
Lefty/Asian mag.
Bezerk
Comics Mag
In Passing
Bloggish
Cal Newsites
Daily Californian
Student Newspaper
Daily Planet
City Newspaper
Berkeleyan
Faculty/Staff news
Newscenter
Administrative Announcements
Indybay
Hard Left News
East Bay Express
Alt-weekly
Cal Other
UC Rally Committee
Stand nineteen feet tall! Be united! Be tough! Be proud!
CyberBears
GO BEARS!
ASUC
Cal's Student government
One
Cal's Student Portal
Berkeley Bookswap
Good Deals

Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com