Don't mess this up!
-Kevin Deenihan, Emeritus Home Archive Extended Help CalStuff! Disclaimer: Calstuff and/or the opinions expressed are not affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley. Recent Guest Posts
Tenants' Rights Weekby Jason Overman Search Powered by: Contact
FaceBook CalStuff! Allen L. About IM Andy R. About IM Ben N. About IM Cooper N. About IM Syndication
Site Feed (ATOM)
Comments Feed Add to LJ Friends Berkeley Blogs
CalJunket With humor. Cal Patriot Blog Conservative Blog UC Berkeley Livejournal Discussion Forum California Patriot Watch Self Explanatory Brad DeLong Econ Prof The Bird House Cal Prof on everything Cal Politik Rants & Raves Beetle Beat Full Time Whiner "Frat" Life Cal "Frat" Boy Cal Tzedek Jewish Students Blog Personal as Public
Soft Boiled Life Hilariously Un-PC. Cal Alumni/ Squelch Blogs
Kedstuff Remember him? I Fought the Law Optimus Primed Zembla With Cuteness Ne Quid Nimis With Photography |
Wednesday, February 05, 2003
The new Patriot has an explosive article claiming that UC Berkeley bathrooms are used for anonymous gay sex-- and that the encounters are organized on the Cal Queer Alliance message board. (Go to 'Personals' and look around for 'Glory Holes.')
there is a map to the holes - e mail me for the facts -- i just have to make sure you are NOT a 40 yo and please be a Cal student..That particular message has 10 replies asking for the map. The Patriot is trying to build a case that promoting not-incredibly-dangerous sex is supposed to be part of QA's mission. But the QA member who's quoted doesn't seem very concerned by the Glory Hole stuff. But John Mendoza, co-chair of the UC Lesbian Gay Bisexual Transgender and Intersex Association, described the Web site as “a great place for people to express themselves.” The disclaimer for the 'Personals' board states Reminder - We do not promote or sanction any of the activities described within, any posts reflect the ideals of the individual who posts them.To what extent are they responsible? Message Board liability is a tricky one, but generally speaking if a Moderator is aware of illegal activity they can be considered liable. Would something really bad-- for example, if one of the maybe-mythical 'HIV Chasers' posted a want ad-- would that be censured? Shouldn't QA at least disapprove of this sort of thing on sexual safety grounds? Anonymous sex in bathrooms is incredibly dangerous, leaving aside the Patriot's own moral problems with it. QA is apparently knowingly balancing the freedom of an unmoderated message board against campus bathrooms being used to spread HIV. Not a great trade. If that's the extent of QA's concern for stopping the spread of STDs, appalling. The Patriot continues more or less with this line of reasoning, listing the various funding sources that are using QA to promote safe sex. The Patriot also implies that the Administration is behind the ball on this one, but the message board makes it seem like UCPD is both aware of the message board and using it for glory hole prevention. the update on the map to the HOLES goes like this:I'm sure the vast majority of QA is neither aware nor proud of any of this. Hopefully they'll realize it vastly undermines any leadership role they think they have in ending the HIV epidemic. Email This Post! |
Advertisements
Cal Magazines
Heuristic Squelch Humor Mag California Patriot Conservative Hardboiled Lefty/Asian mag. Bezerk Comics Mag In Passing Bloggish Cal Newsites
Daily CalifornianStudent Newspaper Daily Planet City Newspaper Berkeleyan Faculty/Staff news Newscenter Administrative Announcements Indybay Hard Left News East Bay Express Alt-weekly Cal Other
UC Rally Committee Stand nineteen feet tall! Be united! Be tough! Be proud! CyberBears GO BEARS! ASUC Cal's Student government One Cal's Student Portal Berkeley Bookswap Good Deals |