Calstuff
Don't mess this up!
-Kevin Deenihan,
Emeritus


Home
Archive
Extended

Help CalStuff!

Disclaimer: Calstuff and/or the opinions expressed are not affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley.
Recent Guest Posts
Tenants' Rights Week
by Jason Overman
Search

Powered by:
Contact
Email Calstuff
FaceBook CalStuff!
Allen L.
 About
 E-mail
 IM
Andy R.
 About
 E-mail
 IM
Ben N.
 About
 E-mail
 IM
Cooper N.

 About
 E-mail
 IM
Syndication
Site Feed (ATOM)
Comments Feed
Add to LJ Friends

Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Subscribe with Bloglines
Berkeley Blogs
CalJunket
With humor.
Cal Patriot Blog
Conservative Blog
UC Berkeley Livejournal
Discussion Forum
California Patriot Watch
Self Explanatory
Brad DeLong
Econ Prof
The Bird House
Cal Prof on everything
Cal Politik
Rants & Raves
Beetle Beat
Full Time Whiner
"Frat" Life
Cal "Frat" Boy
Cal Tzedek
Jewish Students Blog
Personal as Public
Soft Boiled Life
Hilariously Un-PC.
Cal Alumni/ Squelch Blogs
Kedstuff
Remember him?
I Fought the Law
Optimus Primed
Zembla
With Cuteness
Ne Quid Nimis
With Photography
Thursday, October 23, 2003
# posted by Kevin @ 11:52 AM

Here's the LA Times story with me in it.
For many on campus, the growing debate over who should be admitted bears little resemblance to the battles over free speech or other movements that have roiled this activist community in the past. The issues are muddier, more complex — and many of the relevant facts, for now, remain under wraps.

"There's not enough information," said Kevin Deenihan, 21, a senior economics major who runs a Web log for campus news. "It's still pretty vague."
I like the implication that if we really understood what was going on, we'd actually care. What I actually meant was that the LA Times is clearly pushing harder then their own knowledge. All we know is SAT information, a now-minor part of total admissions and a poor measurement in any case. 'Muddier?' 'More Complex?' How about LESS Complex-- in that this is a very predictable result of Comprehensive Admissions. And it's much less complex then the fight over Affirmative Action, over Free Speech, and so on, mostly because this is a marginal result to an Admissions process that basically ensured these results in advance.

Oh well. I felt bad for the Reporters. They were sent up to write the text for the headline 'Students really care about LA Times story.' But this is of no interest to non-political students; they were admitted! This was a good result for pro-aff. am. students, who are hardly inclined to complain. The Republicans are a bit teed, but they have more important battles to fight. I suggested that a better story would be 'Students lose interest in Admissions battles,' but it didn't fly. It is, of course, possible that there will be a furor if this leads to a push to ditch Comprehensive Admissions, but we aren't there yet, and I doubt we ever will be.

Word on the street is that some more LAT Reporters are poking around Berkeley, trying to find the people admitted with low SATs. They're also following up on the story I broke a few days ago about the Administration interviewing some of the students admitted with low SATs.
Email This Post!

Home
Advertisements
Advertising Policy

Place an Ad on Calstuff



Get Firefox!

Cal Magazines
Heuristic Squelch
Humor Mag
California Patriot
Conservative
Hardboiled
Lefty/Asian mag.
Bezerk
Comics Mag
In Passing
Bloggish
Cal Newsites
Daily Californian
Student Newspaper
Daily Planet
City Newspaper
Berkeleyan
Faculty/Staff news
Newscenter
Administrative Announcements
Indybay
Hard Left News
East Bay Express
Alt-weekly
Cal Other
UC Rally Committee
Stand nineteen feet tall! Be united! Be tough! Be proud!
CyberBears
GO BEARS!
ASUC
Cal's Student government
One
Cal's Student Portal
Berkeley Bookswap
Good Deals

Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com