Calstuff
Don't mess this up!
-Kevin Deenihan,
Emeritus


Home
Archive
Extended

Help CalStuff!

Disclaimer: Calstuff and/or the opinions expressed are not affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley.
Recent Guest Posts
Tenants' Rights Week
by Jason Overman
Search

Powered by:
Contact

FaceBook CalStuff!
Allen L.
 About
 
 IM
Andy R.
 About
 
 IM
Ben N.
 About
 
 IM
Cooper N.

 About
 
 IM
Syndication
Site Feed (ATOM)
Comments Feed
Add to LJ Friends

Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Subscribe with Bloglines
Berkeley Blogs
CalJunket
With humor.
Cal Patriot Blog
Conservative Blog
UC Berkeley Livejournal
Discussion Forum
California Patriot Watch
Self Explanatory
Brad DeLong
Econ Prof
The Bird House
Cal Prof on everything
Cal Politik
Rants & Raves
Beetle Beat
Full Time Whiner
"Frat" Life
Cal "Frat" Boy
Cal Tzedek
Jewish Students Blog
Personal as Public
Soft Boiled Life
Hilariously Un-PC.
Cal Alumni/ Squelch Blogs
Kedstuff
Remember him?
I Fought the Law
Optimus Primed
Zembla
With Cuteness
Ne Quid Nimis
With Photography
Tuesday, April 27, 2004
# posted by Anonymous @ 2:21 PM

Suit Under Seal, What Could It Be?

Apart from the public suits we have all heard and read about, thanks to the coverage of my fellow CalStuff correspondents, there still remains one elections related suit that is under seal.

Going on just a hunch, I suspect it to be about CalSERVE’s alleged campaigning within a hundred feet of the Boalt Hall polling station. From what I hear, there is plenty of evidence against CalSERVE to convict them on this charge. The Attorney General tried to file this suit last week, but as we all know he was late in filing his charges.

The J-Council Rules of Procedure have very little to say about Sealed suits:
Charge sheets are not accessible to anyone other than the Justices if the plaintiff files the sheet under seal. The Council may unseal the charge at anytime.

I also think that Student Action is the likeliest party to have filed a sealed suit against CalSERVE.

So why would SA file under seal?

One Reason I can think of:

1. To avoid being counter-sued by CalSERVE. If they had something this juicy on CalSERVE, which would result in a DQ if proven, then why would they want to put themselves at risk of having CalSERVE throw the book at them? This seems like an easy way to avoid a “nuclear suit exchange”.

Of course this is just all speculation but I think this particular charge is the likeliest bet.
Email This Post!

Home
Advertisements
Advertising Policy

Place an Ad on Calstuff



Get Firefox!

Cal Magazines
Heuristic Squelch
Humor Mag
California Patriot
Conservative
Hardboiled
Lefty/Asian mag.
Bezerk
Comics Mag
In Passing
Bloggish
Cal Newsites
Daily Californian
Student Newspaper
Daily Planet
City Newspaper
Berkeleyan
Faculty/Staff news
Newscenter
Administrative Announcements
Indybay
Hard Left News
East Bay Express
Alt-weekly
Cal Other
UC Rally Committee
Stand nineteen feet tall! Be united! Be tough! Be proud!
CyberBears
GO BEARS!
ASUC
Cal's Student government
One
Cal's Student Portal
Berkeley Bookswap
Good Deals

Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com