Don't mess this up!
-Kevin Deenihan, Emeritus Home Archive Extended Help CalStuff! Disclaimer: Calstuff and/or the opinions expressed are not affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley. Recent Guest Posts
Tenants' Rights Weekby Jason Overman Search Powered by: Contact
FaceBook CalStuff! Allen L. About IM Andy R. About IM Ben N. About IM Cooper N. About IM Syndication
Site Feed (ATOM)
Comments Feed Add to LJ Friends Berkeley Blogs
CalJunket With humor. Cal Patriot Blog Conservative Blog UC Berkeley Livejournal Discussion Forum California Patriot Watch Self Explanatory Brad DeLong Econ Prof The Bird House Cal Prof on everything Cal Politik Rants & Raves Beetle Beat Full Time Whiner "Frat" Life Cal "Frat" Boy Cal Tzedek Jewish Students Blog Personal as Public
Soft Boiled Life Hilariously Un-PC. Cal Alumni/ Squelch Blogs
Kedstuff Remember him? I Fought the Law Optimus Primed Zembla With Cuteness Ne Quid Nimis With Photography |
Wednesday, July 14, 2004
Regents Postpone Raise in GPA Requirement
It looks like the proposal is coming under attack from the usual suspects. Here is the link from the SF Chronicle. The biggest and it seems, only, complaint seems to be that the new GPA requirement would reduce the number of minority students eligible for UC admission. While this argument has statistical weight to it, it is fundamentally flawed on several counts. 1. Keeping admissions requirements low or as I would say "dumbing them down" is not a long term fix to the very real problem of below average educational opportunities that accrue to minority students. In essence it does nothing to address this problem, rather it puts of the date of doing something serious about public education in impoverished areas by artificially keeping standards lower than they should be. I have long thought affirmative action in college admissions does the same thing; It puts of needed reform in favor of lower standards. I would argue that keeping GPA standards low hurts minority students in the long and even short run. 2. The UC's are meant to be much more selective than other state schools. We should not imperil the level of students that the University attracts in order to let in unqualified people. Granted this new GPA requirement would not affect Berkeley (or UCLA) much, but it could affect other UC's. It should not be to much to expect students to have at least a B- average. 3. Raising GPA standards affects the State's other minority groups (asian and white students) as well. Of course falling from a 6% eligibility rating to a 4% rating is a bigger fall in % terms than a 31% to 27% fall. But isn't the question that minority advocates should be looking at: "why do only 6% of African American high school students qualify for UC admission?" Rather than spending their time fighting a much needed rise in requirements, it would better serve them to spend their time figuring out what to do about high schools in inner city areas. I have a solution for them: vouchers... But politics has gotten in the way of this common sense idea already.Email This Post! |
Advertisements
Cal Magazines
Heuristic Squelch Humor Mag California Patriot Conservative Hardboiled Lefty/Asian mag. Bezerk Comics Mag In Passing Bloggish Cal Newsites
Daily CalifornianStudent Newspaper Daily Planet City Newspaper Berkeleyan Faculty/Staff news Newscenter Administrative Announcements Indybay Hard Left News East Bay Express Alt-weekly Cal Other
UC Rally Committee Stand nineteen feet tall! Be united! Be tough! Be proud! CyberBears GO BEARS! ASUC Cal's Student government One Cal's Student Portal Berkeley Bookswap Good Deals |