Calstuff
Don't mess this up!
-Kevin Deenihan,
Emeritus


Home
Archive
Extended

Help CalStuff!

Disclaimer: Calstuff and/or the opinions expressed are not affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley.
Recent Guest Posts
Tenants' Rights Week
by Jason Overman
Search

Powered by:
Contact

FaceBook CalStuff!
Allen L.
 About
 
 IM
Andy R.
 About
 
 IM
Ben N.
 About
 
 IM
Cooper N.

 About
 
 IM
Syndication
Site Feed (ATOM)
Comments Feed
Add to LJ Friends

Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Subscribe with Bloglines
Berkeley Blogs
CalJunket
With humor.
Cal Patriot Blog
Conservative Blog
UC Berkeley Livejournal
Discussion Forum
California Patriot Watch
Self Explanatory
Brad DeLong
Econ Prof
The Bird House
Cal Prof on everything
Cal Politik
Rants & Raves
Beetle Beat
Full Time Whiner
"Frat" Life
Cal "Frat" Boy
Cal Tzedek
Jewish Students Blog
Personal as Public
Soft Boiled Life
Hilariously Un-PC.
Cal Alumni/ Squelch Blogs
Kedstuff
Remember him?
I Fought the Law
Optimus Primed
Zembla
With Cuteness
Ne Quid Nimis
With Photography
Wednesday, July 14, 2004
# posted by Anonymous @ 8:02 PM

Regents Postpone Raise in GPA Requirement

It looks like the proposal is coming under attack from the usual suspects. Here is the link from the SF Chronicle.

The biggest and it seems, only, complaint seems to be that the new GPA requirement would reduce the number of minority students eligible for UC admission. While this argument has statistical weight to it, it is fundamentally flawed on several counts.

1. Keeping admissions requirements low or as I would say "dumbing them down" is not a long term fix to the very real problem of below average educational opportunities that accrue to minority students. In essence it does nothing to address this problem, rather it puts of the date of doing something serious about public education in impoverished areas by artificially keeping standards lower than they should be.

I have long thought affirmative action in college admissions does the same thing; It puts of needed reform in favor of lower standards. I would argue that keeping GPA standards low hurts minority students in the long and even short run.

2. The UC's are meant to be much more selective than other state schools. We should not imperil the level of students that the University attracts in order to let in unqualified people. Granted this new GPA requirement would not affect Berkeley (or UCLA) much, but it could affect other UC's. It should not be to much to expect students to have at least a B- average.

3. Raising GPA standards affects the State's other minority groups (asian and white students) as well. Of course falling from a 6% eligibility rating to a 4% rating is a bigger fall in % terms than a 31% to 27% fall. But isn't the question that minority advocates should be looking at: "why do only 6% of African American high school students qualify for UC admission?" Rather than spending their time fighting a much needed rise in requirements, it would better serve them to spend their time figuring out what to do about high schools in inner city areas. I have a solution for them: vouchers... But politics has gotten in the way of this common sense idea already.
Email This Post!

Home
Advertisements
Advertising Policy

Place an Ad on Calstuff



Get Firefox!

Cal Magazines
Heuristic Squelch
Humor Mag
California Patriot
Conservative
Hardboiled
Lefty/Asian mag.
Bezerk
Comics Mag
In Passing
Bloggish
Cal Newsites
Daily Californian
Student Newspaper
Daily Planet
City Newspaper
Berkeleyan
Faculty/Staff news
Newscenter
Administrative Announcements
Indybay
Hard Left News
East Bay Express
Alt-weekly
Cal Other
UC Rally Committee
Stand nineteen feet tall! Be united! Be tough! Be proud!
CyberBears
GO BEARS!
ASUC
Cal's Student government
One
Cal's Student Portal
Berkeley Bookswap
Good Deals

Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com