Calstuff
Don't mess this up!
-Kevin Deenihan,
Emeritus


Home
Archive
Extended

Help CalStuff!

Disclaimer: Calstuff and/or the opinions expressed are not affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley.
Recent Guest Posts
Tenants' Rights Week
by Jason Overman
Search

Powered by:
Contact

FaceBook CalStuff!
Allen L.
 About
 
 IM
Andy R.
 About
 
 IM
Ben N.
 About
 
 IM
Cooper N.

 About
 
 IM
Syndication
Site Feed (ATOM)
Comments Feed
Add to LJ Friends

Subscribe in NewsGator Online
Subscribe with Bloglines
Berkeley Blogs
CalJunket
With humor.
Cal Patriot Blog
Conservative Blog
UC Berkeley Livejournal
Discussion Forum
California Patriot Watch
Self Explanatory
Brad DeLong
Econ Prof
The Bird House
Cal Prof on everything
Cal Politik
Rants & Raves
Beetle Beat
Full Time Whiner
"Frat" Life
Cal "Frat" Boy
Cal Tzedek
Jewish Students Blog
Personal as Public
Soft Boiled Life
Hilariously Un-PC.
Cal Alumni/ Squelch Blogs
Kedstuff
Remember him?
I Fought the Law
Optimus Primed
Zembla
With Cuteness
Ne Quid Nimis
With Photography
Friday, September 24, 2004
# posted by Anonymous @ 10:50 PM

Regents Finalize GPA Proposal

The UC Regents, at their meeting Thursday morning at UCSF, voted to raise the GPA requirement to 3.0. The previous minimum was 2.8.

Daily Cal Coverage

Daily Cal Editorial

SFGate Coverage

Now, what effect will this have on UC Berkeley? Probably very little. According to the UC Berkeley Common Data Set, the average GPA for 2003-04 incoming first-years was 4.24. 99% of first-year students had a GPA above 3.0. So, the impact on UC Berkeley will be minimal.

What effect might this have on the UC system? Potentially, a much more substantial one. According to the UC Riverside Common Data Set, the average GPA for 2003-04 incoming first-years was 3.42. Only 88% of first-year students had a GPA above 3.0. That leaves a substantial amount of students out in the cold in the new policy. The UCOP's website puts the system-wide mean GPA at 3.8. So, if you average GPAs and percentages, approximately 6% of last year’s first-year class would not have gotten in to a UC school. That is an estimate because I can’t find those percentages.

The problem with this new policy goes beyond the fact that this policy will hurt lower-income students without the same opportunity for weighted classes to increase their GPAs. The larger problem is that it acknowledges that the current system of judging high school performance has any validity. Weighted GPA is incredibly relative, and cannot be used to accurately distinguish one student from another. Given, anything above a weighted 4.3 generally is still pretty impressive in that it shows that the student is taking many advanced courses and succeeding in them. But blatant inequalities in the high school system make a 4.3 impossible for many students, setting them at a disadvantage.

This is why the new comprehensive review program had the potential to really make progress in the admissions program. Unfortunately, after a year with mitigating circumstances (jobless economy = less diversity in college attendees), the program is not being given a fair chance to prove itself as an effective way to help solve any perceived problems with the UC admissions system.
Email This Post!

Home
Advertisements
Advertising Policy

Place an Ad on Calstuff



Get Firefox!

Cal Magazines
Heuristic Squelch
Humor Mag
California Patriot
Conservative
Hardboiled
Lefty/Asian mag.
Bezerk
Comics Mag
In Passing
Bloggish
Cal Newsites
Daily Californian
Student Newspaper
Daily Planet
City Newspaper
Berkeleyan
Faculty/Staff news
Newscenter
Administrative Announcements
Indybay
Hard Left News
East Bay Express
Alt-weekly
Cal Other
UC Rally Committee
Stand nineteen feet tall! Be united! Be tough! Be proud!
CyberBears
GO BEARS!
ASUC
Cal's Student government
One
Cal's Student Portal
Berkeley Bookswap
Good Deals

Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com