Don't mess this up!
-Kevin Deenihan, Emeritus Home Archive Extended Help CalStuff! Disclaimer: Calstuff and/or the opinions expressed are not affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley. Recent Guest Posts
Tenants' Rights Weekby Jason Overman Search Powered by: Contact
FaceBook CalStuff! Allen L. About IM Andy R. About IM Ben N. About IM Cooper N. About IM Syndication
Site Feed (ATOM)
Comments Feed Add to LJ Friends Berkeley Blogs
CalJunket With humor. Cal Patriot Blog Conservative Blog UC Berkeley Livejournal Discussion Forum California Patriot Watch Self Explanatory Brad DeLong Econ Prof The Bird House Cal Prof on everything Cal Politik Rants & Raves Beetle Beat Full Time Whiner "Frat" Life Cal "Frat" Boy Cal Tzedek Jewish Students Blog Personal as Public
Soft Boiled Life Hilariously Un-PC. Cal Alumni/ Squelch Blogs
Kedstuff Remember him? I Fought the Law Optimus Primed Zembla With Cuteness Ne Quid Nimis With Photography |
Friday, September 24, 2004
Regents Finalize GPA Proposal
The UC Regents, at their meeting Thursday morning at UCSF, voted to raise the GPA requirement to 3.0. The previous minimum was 2.8. Daily Cal Coverage Daily Cal Editorial SFGate Coverage Now, what effect will this have on UC Berkeley? Probably very little. According to the UC Berkeley Common Data Set, the average GPA for 2003-04 incoming first-years was 4.24. 99% of first-year students had a GPA above 3.0. So, the impact on UC Berkeley will be minimal. What effect might this have on the UC system? Potentially, a much more substantial one. According to the UC Riverside Common Data Set, the average GPA for 2003-04 incoming first-years was 3.42. Only 88% of first-year students had a GPA above 3.0. That leaves a substantial amount of students out in the cold in the new policy. The UCOP's website puts the system-wide mean GPA at 3.8. So, if you average GPAs and percentages, approximately 6% of last year’s first-year class would not have gotten in to a UC school. That is an estimate because I can’t find those percentages. The problem with this new policy goes beyond the fact that this policy will hurt lower-income students without the same opportunity for weighted classes to increase their GPAs. The larger problem is that it acknowledges that the current system of judging high school performance has any validity. Weighted GPA is incredibly relative, and cannot be used to accurately distinguish one student from another. Given, anything above a weighted 4.3 generally is still pretty impressive in that it shows that the student is taking many advanced courses and succeeding in them. But blatant inequalities in the high school system make a 4.3 impossible for many students, setting them at a disadvantage. This is why the new comprehensive review program had the potential to really make progress in the admissions program. Unfortunately, after a year with mitigating circumstances (jobless economy = less diversity in college attendees), the program is not being given a fair chance to prove itself as an effective way to help solve any perceived problems with the UC admissions system. Email This Post! |
Advertisements
Cal Magazines
Heuristic Squelch Humor Mag California Patriot Conservative Hardboiled Lefty/Asian mag. Bezerk Comics Mag In Passing Bloggish Cal Newsites
Daily CalifornianStudent Newspaper Daily Planet City Newspaper Berkeleyan Faculty/Staff news Newscenter Administrative Announcements Indybay Hard Left News East Bay Express Alt-weekly Cal Other
UC Rally Committee Stand nineteen feet tall! Be united! Be tough! Be proud! CyberBears GO BEARS! ASUC Cal's Student government One Cal's Student Portal Berkeley Bookswap Good Deals |