Recap of FSM 40th Anniversary Celebration Week

Note the emphasis on week.

Overall, the week of events could have gone much better. Turnout was poor at many events. And, when a substantial turnout was present (i.e. Friday’s rally), the crowd’s motives were suspect. Many students left Friday’s rally after Dean gave a bluntly political speech during what should have been a celebratory event.

The ASUC’s lack of ability to bring a turnout to these events is very reflective of some of its more substantial problems – chiefly, the lack of an effective centrally-controlled communication source. Flyering is not able to convey any message on this campus, not enough people read the Daily Cal close enough to read the ASUC info page, and no one goes to asuc.org anymore.

Complicating the situation were conflicts within the planning of the events. The ASUC Office of the President had an almost cavalier attitude towards the planning of the event, and this led to many conflicts. Many FSMers backstage at the event seemed flustered and frustrated that their work was being objectified in the way that it was. Administrators, including Chancellor Birgeneau, were overheard to have voiced their disapproval of the lack of communication and shared planning. Faculty members were also frustrated with their lack of involvement with the programs.

Pictures from the rally will be posted here when I get them.Email This Post!